Comments on: Source Sans Pro: Adobe’s first open source type family https://blog.typekit.com/2012/08/02/source-sans-pro/ News about Typekit Tue, 21 May 2013 04:28:06 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.1 By: Miguel Sousa https://blog.typekit.com/2012/08/02/source-sans-pro/#comment-3592 Tue, 21 May 2013 04:28:06 +0000 http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/?p=2648#comment-3592 In reply to L..

Thanks. Please submit the request at https://github.com/adobe/source-sans-pro/issues

]]>
By: L. https://blog.typekit.com/2012/08/02/source-sans-pro/#comment-3591 Mon, 20 May 2013 02:15:02 +0000 http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/?p=2648#comment-3591 Thanks for a very nice font!
Could you add support for U+202F NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE (useful for French typography)?

]]>
By: Simon https://blog.typekit.com/2012/08/02/source-sans-pro/#comment-3590 Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:09:15 +0000 http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/?p=2648#comment-3590 I fully agree with building a font for comfortable prolonged reading, so many applications do not provide a clear font which is frustrating as an end user.

]]>
By: Luke https://blog.typekit.com/2012/08/02/source-sans-pro/#comment-3589 Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:48:00 +0000 http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/?p=2648#comment-3589 Looks really good, nice one on the font! It’s a very clean looking font and is very professional at the same time.

]]>
By: KD33 https://blog.typekit.com/2012/08/02/source-sans-pro/#comment-3588 Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:43:00 +0000 http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/?p=2648#comment-3588 In reply to Teg.

Ubuntu is not the most popular GNU/Linux distribution. That honour goes to Linux Mint.

]]>
By: KD33 https://blog.typekit.com/2012/08/02/source-sans-pro/#comment-3587 Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:59:00 +0000 http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/?p=2648#comment-3587 I’ve just used FontSquirrel’s @font-face tool to use all four available stylistic sets in the regular and bold weights of the font at once. Do I have to rename the font now? If so, will you please grant me permission to use the Reserved Font Name for these two weights? (There is a tiny chance that I may be redistributing it, but most likely it will only be for my personal use.) For if the OFL is to be taken literally, you would have to rename a font if you simply applied a stylistic set to it.

I think this is a flaw in the OFL. I think you shouldn’t have to rename a font that you’re not giving to anyone else.

]]>
By: KD33 https://blog.typekit.com/2012/08/02/source-sans-pro/#comment-3586 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:50:33 +0000 http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/?p=2648#comment-3586 In reply to KD33.

And I see now on the comments for Source Sans Pro that it’s necessary, because there has to be enough space to accommodate the black weight.

]]>
By: KD33 https://blog.typekit.com/2012/08/02/source-sans-pro/#comment-3585 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:49:05 +0000 http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/?p=2648#comment-3585 In reply to Paul D. Hunt.

I agree with Nikolaus. It would be really nice if there were stylistic sets that included all fifteen possible combinations of alternate letterforms (i.e. tail-free l, crossbarred I, and one-story a and g). In my case I would use the one with all four activated, and then Source Sans Pro would be my perfect font.

]]>
By: KD33 https://blog.typekit.com/2012/08/02/source-sans-pro/#comment-3584 Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:33:02 +0000 http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/?p=2648#comment-3584 In reply to KD33.

I withdraw my case. Source Sans Pro’s line spacing is identical to Calibri’s, which is just fine, so it’s alright after all. It only appears large because of SSP’s large letterforms.

]]>
By: KD33 https://blog.typekit.com/2012/08/02/source-sans-pro/#comment-3583 Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:17:09 +0000 http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/?p=2648#comment-3583 In reply to Paul D. Hunt.

Although, I should note that I very much enjoy Source Sans and Source Code Pro and can hardly wait for the release of new features on each.

]]>