Comments on: Building our font library https://blog.typekit.com/2009/08/20/building-our-font-library/ News about Typekit Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:35:54 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.1 By: Семен Соколов https://blog.typekit.com/2009/08/20/building-our-font-library/#comment-1013 Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:35:54 +0000 http://blog.typekit.com/?p=182#comment-1013 Это хорошо что вы начали вести блог,ведь у вас это отлично получается и надеюсь будет еще лучше. Главное писать о том,в чем вы разбираетесь. Удачи. 🙂

]]>
By: Ruth Martinez https://blog.typekit.com/2009/08/20/building-our-font-library/#comment-1012 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:50:55 +0000 http://blog.typekit.com/?p=182#comment-1012 I think it would be great to have a link to Typekit. I agree with totally agree with John Jame Jacoby. I was and still am in the business and feel we were screaming out for this. We had computers 15 yrs ago when I was doing my btec but had to do any fonts by hand or print it of then transfer it. So laboriously slow.

]]>
By: Marat https://blog.typekit.com/2009/08/20/building-our-font-library/#comment-1011 Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:57:22 +0000 http://blog.typekit.com/?p=182#comment-1011 Guys, what about cyrillic fonts? Is there a chance?

]]>
By: Dorothy Alban https://blog.typekit.com/2009/08/20/building-our-font-library/#comment-1010 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:30:31 +0000 http://blog.typekit.com/?p=182#comment-1010 There are few good website using this technology: cufon.
You can see an example of font nested in html here: http://www.kreativehouse.it

]]>
By: Christopher Werby https://blog.typekit.com/2009/08/20/building-our-font-library/#comment-1009 Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:08:16 +0000 http://blog.typekit.com/?p=182#comment-1009 How about putting up a page using your solution and showing how these fonts look on a real web page? It would be nice to be able to load the test page in several different browsers to test how it works cross platform.

]]>
By: Stephen White https://blog.typekit.com/2009/08/20/building-our-font-library/#comment-1008 Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:59:19 +0000 http://blog.typekit.com/?p=182#comment-1008 We are very excited about this! How can we get an invite!

Wooo Hoo!

]]>
By: wes https://blog.typekit.com/2009/08/20/building-our-font-library/#comment-1007 Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:04:47 +0000 http://blog.typekit.com/?p=182#comment-1007 In reply to Mary.

It’s a legitimate fear. But the benefits for designers outweigh my worries. Some will always make a mess of things, but we shouldn’t let that hold back the state of the art.

]]>
By: Jim https://blog.typekit.com/2009/08/20/building-our-font-library/#comment-1006 Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:00:40 +0000 http://blog.typekit.com/?p=182#comment-1006 Aww, shoot. I’m a big fan of your work and was hoping to ease my life a little by being able to use Kinescope as text. I had tried out Cufon with much success, but removed it because of the legal issues surrounding it (I was also secretly hoping Typekit would be able to support it).

I guess I’ll stick with images for now and hopefully find another similarly beautiful font for pullquotes and blockquotes.

]]>
By: don https://blog.typekit.com/2009/08/20/building-our-font-library/#comment-1005 Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:57:58 +0000 http://blog.typekit.com/?p=182#comment-1005 In reply to Mary.

Pretty much what people said about desktop publishing in the ’80s. The Ransom Note effect.

Designers can create awful pages already. Take a look at some MySpace pages some time. At least if their ‘individuality’ is confined to a css file, it will be easy to over ride.

]]>
By: Mark Simonson https://blog.typekit.com/2009/08/20/building-our-font-library/#comment-1004 Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:46:38 +0000 http://blog.typekit.com/?p=182#comment-1004 @Jim: “No Kinescope from Simonson?! That font is gorgeous, please add as soon as possible.”

I’d love to add it to TypeKit, but I’m reluctant because it relies heavily on OpenType layout features for it to set properly, which are not supported by any browsers yet.

]]>